🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing compensation totaling $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear response by the Kremlin regarding plans to use frozen Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week regarding a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have argued that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory measures, including seizing European corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious attack on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past stated it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if such holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."