🔗 Share this article

This protest movement isn't broadcast, but it could have webbed feet and large eyes.

Additionally, it could include a unicorn's horn or the plumage of a chicken.

While rallies against the administration carry on in US cities, demonstrators have embraced the energy of a local block party. They've provided salsa lessons, given away snacks, and performed on unicycles, while police watch.

Blending levity and political action – a strategy social scientists term "tactical frivolity" – isn't novel. Yet it has transformed into a hallmark of protests in the United States in this period, embraced by both left and right.

One particular emblem has emerged as notably significant – the frog. It began after a video of a confrontation between an individual in a frog suit and immigration enforcement agents in the city of Portland, became an internet sensation. And it has since spread to demonstrations across the country.

"There is much going on with that small blow-up amphibian," states an expert, who teaches at UC Davis and a Guggenheim Fellow who focuses on performance art.

The Path From Pepe to Portland

It's hard to examine demonstrations and amphibians without talking about Pepe, a cartoon character co-opted by online communities throughout an election cycle.

When the character first took off online, it was used to convey specific feelings. Later, its use evolved to express backing for a candidate, including a particular image endorsed by the candidate himself, showing Pepe with a signature suit and hair.

The frog was also portrayed in certain internet forums in offensive ways, portrayed as a historical dictator. Online conservatives exchanged "unique frog images" and set up cryptocurrency in his name. His catchphrase, "that feels good", was deployed an inside joke.

However Pepe didn't start out so controversial.

Matt Furie, artist Matt Furie, has been vocal about his unhappiness for its appropriation. His creation was meant as simply a relaxed amphibian in his comic world.

This character first appeared in a series of comics in the mid-2000s – non-political and best known for a quirky behavior. In a documentary, which chronicles Mr Furie's efforts to take back of his creation, he explained his drawing came from his time with friends and roommates.

As he started out, the artist tried uploading his work to early internet platforms, where other users began to borrow, remix and reinvent his character. As its popularity grew into darker parts of the internet, Mr Furie tried to disavow his creation, including ending its life in a comic strip.

However, its legacy continued.

"This demonstrates the lack of control over icons," says Prof Bogad. "Their meaning can evolve and be reclaimed."

Until recently, the notoriety of this meme meant that frogs were largely associated with the right. A transformation occurred on a day in October, when a viral moment between a protestor dressed in an inflatable frog costume and a federal agent in Portland, Oregon captured global attention.

The moment came just days after an order to deploy military personnel to the city, which was described as "a warzone". Demonstrators began to assemble in large numbers on a single block, just outside of an ICE office.

The situation was tense and a officer sprayed pepper spray at a protester, aiming directly into the air intake fan of the puffy frog costume.

Seth Todd, Seth Todd, quipped, remarking it tasted like "something milder". But the incident went viral.

The frog suit was somewhat typical for Portland, known for its quirky culture and activist demonstrations that revel in the unusual – public yoga, 80s-style aerobics lessons, and nude cycling groups. Its creed is "Embrace the Strange."

The frog became part of in a lawsuit between the federal government and Portland, which claimed the deployment was unlawful.

While a judge decided that month that the administration had the right to deploy troops, a dissenting judge wrote, mentioning the protesters' "well-known penchant for using unusual attire when expressing their disagreement."

"It is easy to see this decision, which adopts the government's characterization as a war zone, as merely absurd," Judge Susan Graber stated. "But today's decision is not merely absurd."

The order was stopped legally just a month later, and troops withdrew from the area.

However, by that time, the frog had transformed into a potent symbol of resistance for the left.

This symbol appeared in many cities at anti-authoritarian protests last autumn. Amphibian costumes were present – and unicorns and axolotls and dinosaurs – in San Diego and Atlanta and Boston. They were in small towns and global metropolises like Tokyo and London.

The frog costume was backordered on online retailers, and became more expensive.

Shaping the Optics

The link between both frogs together – is the relationship between the silly, innocent image and serious intent. This is what "tactical frivolity."

The strategy is based on what the professor terms the "irresistible image" – usually humorous, it acts as a "disarming and charming" display that calls attention to your ideas without needing directly articulating them. This is the unusual prop you wear, or the symbol you share.

The professor is both an expert on this topic and someone who uses these tactics. He authored a text on the subject, and led seminars internationally.

"One can look back to historical periods – under oppressive regimes, they use absurdity to speak the truth indirectly and while maintaining a layer of protection."

The purpose of such tactics is three-fold, he explains.

As protesters confront authority, humorous attire {takes control of|seizes|influences