🔗 Share this article

Perhaps the most iconic pictures of the 20th century portrays a nude girl, her hands outstretched, her expression contorted in pain, her flesh burned and flaking. She is dashing toward the camera while fleeing a bombing during the Vietnam War. To her side, other children also run out of the devastated community in the region, with a scene of black clouds and troops.

The International Effect of a Single Photograph

Just after the release in June 1972, this photograph—formally titled "The Terror of War"—became a pre-digital sensation. Viewed and debated by millions, it's widely credited for energizing public opinion against the American involvement in Vietnam. A prominent author afterwards observed that this horrifically indelible photograph of the young the subject suffering likely was more effective to heighten public revulsion toward the conflict compared to lengthy broadcasts of shown atrocities. A renowned British photojournalist who covered the fighting called it the most powerful image of what became known as “The Television War”. Another seasoned war journalist remarked how the image is in short, among the most significant photographs ever made, specifically of the Vietnam war.

The Long-Standing Claim Followed by a Recent Allegation

For 53 years, the photo was assigned to Nick Út, a young local photojournalist working for the Associated Press during the war. However a controversial latest film on a popular platform contends which states the famous photograph—long considered to be the apex of photojournalism—may have been taken by someone else on the scene during the attack.

As claimed by the documentary, the iconic image was actually photographed by an independent photographer, who provided his work to the news agency. The claim, and its following investigation, originates with a former editor an ex-staffer, who claims how the influential photo chief directed the staff to change the photo's byline from the freelancer to Út, the only employed photographer there that day.

The Quest for the Real Story

The source, now in his 80s, contacted one of the journalists recently, requesting support in finding the uncredited cameraman. He stated that, should he still be alive, he wanted to extend an apology. The filmmaker considered the independent photojournalists he worked with—comparing them to modern freelancers, similar to Vietnamese freelancers at the time, are routinely ignored. Their efforts is frequently doubted, and they operate amid more challenging circumstances. They are not insured, they don’t have pensions, they don’t have support, they often don’t have good equipment, making them highly exposed when documenting in their own communities.

The investigator asked: Imagine the experience for the man who captured this image, if indeed it wasn't Nick Út?” As an image-maker, he imagined, it could be profoundly difficult. As a student of war photography, specifically the vaunted war photography of Vietnam, it would be groundbreaking, maybe legacy-altering. The revered legacy of the image in Vietnamese-Americans was so strong that the director with a background left in that period felt unsure to take on the investigation. He expressed, “I didn’t want to challenge the accepted account attributed to Nick the photograph. Nor did I wish to disturb the existing situation among a group that always respected this success.”

This Search Progresses

However both the filmmaker and the director agreed: it was worth asking the question. As members of the press must hold everybody else in the world,” remarked the investigator, “we have to be able to address tough issues of ourselves.”

The documentary follows the team in their pursuit of their research, from discussions with witnesses, to requests in modern Saigon, to examining footage from additional films recorded at the time. Their work finally produce a candidate: a freelancer, working for a television outlet during the attack who also provided images to the press independently. In the film, an emotional the man, now also in his 80s and living in California, claims that he sold the image to the agency for a small fee and a print, yet remained plagued by the lack of credit over many years.

This Backlash and Additional Analysis

He is portrayed throughout the documentary, quiet and thoughtful, yet his account proved controversial within the community of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to